The $700 billion bailout, a modest proposal |
News - Hugh's Views | |||
Written by Hugh McManus | |||
Warning: mktime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08az/b29/ipw.wellbeyo/public_html/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 119 Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08az/b29/ipw.wellbeyo/public_html/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 247 Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08az/b29/ipw.wellbeyo/public_html/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 251 Warning: strftime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08az/b29/ipw.wellbeyo/public_html/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 252 Thursday, 25 September 2008 15:02 |
|||
So, the government is likely to commit $700 billion or some other gargantuan amount of money to help solve the current crisis. I want to make a modest proposal; the underlying them is that we should punish those who did wrong and reward those who do right. Here goes: The banksThe Department of the Treasury will purchase non-performing loans from banks at a punitive--that is, less than market rate. Banks that participate in the program will also suffer and additional modest, but not insignificant, tax on profits for ten years. The notes purchased for the banks will be collateralized and made available for sale--more in a moment. The homeownersHomeowners who are at the other end of these bad loans will have their mortgages refinanced at the prevailing 30-year fixed rate plus 100 basis points. So, if the 30-year fixed rate is 5.9%, then the newly minted 30-year mortgage will be at 6.9%. Here's the important point: the newly minted mortgage will be based on the outstanding balance and not on the current market value of the property. Next, each year, the outstanding balance will be adjusted up by the core rate of inflation. The goal is to encourage the homeowner to work hard and pay off the loan by getting a traditional mortgage. If someone can't afford a 30-year fixed plus 100 basis points, they shouldn't be in the house anyway. The people footing the billSo, the government essentially collateralizes the debt in some fashion, bundles it and uses the stream of interest payments to those who purchase the debt. Rather than fund it exclusively from foreign borrowing, why not do something analogous to those war bonds of WWII. There's a catch. I want to reward those who are prepared to should the burden for others. These new "bonds" could carry a modest interest rate.
I am trying to think of something that makes the whole bailout (not a great term) more palatable. I do think that those who "sinned" for want of a better term, should not be rewarded and should actually have to face (albeit in a diluted form) the consequences of their actions.
|